Skip Nav

War on Terror Essay


❶The current state of affairs indicates that legislative measures should be amended and altered to the extent where human rights and civil liberties are violated. This is an article that brought to light the ongoing violence in Afghanistan, in specifics the proverbial suicide bomber situation, where an radical Islamic terrorist is willing to blow himself up in order to kill others.

The War on Terror

War on Terror Essay
How to cite this page
Client testimonials

Yet, like so many other national and international challenges there is a reluctance to change. The questionable link that the ush administration established between its war on terror and its military intervention in Iraq, as well as its apparent willingness to suspend fundamental rights if the 'war' requires it exemplified by its practices in Guantanamo ay and its exhortations to extradite terror suspects across Europe , have contributed much to the striking fact that many citizens…… [Read More].

The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa, George W. Bush, State of the Union Address, Jan.

So were claims that Iraq had nuclear weapons. Global Terror War Policy Advice. The resolution of this policy counsel meeting is the endorsement of a refinement of Australia's terror policy with respect both to the preservation of constitutional rights and in terms of approach its relationship to the United States with balance and diplomacy. Recognizing the severity the security threat but simultaneously recognizing the need to refine policies so as to diminish the tendency toward inflaming the political and ideological anger of the developing world, Australia must spend the coming decades finding ways to quell such hostility.

This will mean a closer consideration of the economic, political and trade policies that often have run aground of the interests of the developing world.

Likewise, it means that Australia must function as a continued partner to the U. But also as a voice of conscience with respect to the discretionary use of military force or diplomatic finesse. Australian Muslim…… [Read More]. He has received support from some political groups while facing opposition from others. Each side presents valid arguments on why they believe the U. The invasion eventually lead to the Gulf ar in However, since , Baghdad has refused to allow inspectors into the country until the sanctions are lifted, claiming the weapons no longer exist Yacoub, In May , a new Security Council resolution dealing with U.

So far, globalization has had both positive and negative influences, and has literally split the world into three -- the portion that is already reaping the benefits of globalization and is characterized by high standards of living and stable governments the Core ; that which is yet to reap any benefits and is still grappling with political repression and widespread disease the Gap ; and that which exhibits features of both the Core and the Gap the Seam [footnoteRef: Most Americans tend to think that the problems the Core faces are a result of its association with the Gap; and hence, believe that cutting links would be the solution to the issues of drugs and terrorism.

This, however, is not a valid argument because as long as the Gap is not enjoying the…… [Read More]. Targeted Killing and War on.

In this aspect, Israel is one of the most active countries in targeted killings which have resulted in significant victories against their enemies but only for a short time: In the case of Osama bin Laden, his killing has obviously weakened the organizational structure and chain of command of al Qaeda.

Together with the elimination of other leaders it has created severe fractures in the power of the terrorist activities, but, in the same time, has created a large number of martyrs, which help these type of organizations to gather more and more followers. Various question appear therefore regarding targeted killings from an international law perspective, as well as one from a morality…… [Read More].

Just War Theory Sweeping Changes in the. Just ar Theory Sweeping changes in the way wars are fought have brought current scholars' attention to the ethical concept of the Just ar. The concept of the Just ar is nearly as old as war itself; it is perhaps best codified in Thucydides' History of the Peloponnesian ar. There have historically been two main approaches to deciding what is, in fact, fair in war: In short, these opposing poles represent: The deontological approach takes many cues from Kant's ethics, while the consequentialist or Realist school finds its roots in John Stuart Mill, among others.

Recent work in political philosophy and ethics has attempted to place international…… [Read More]. American Experience With War. Kennedy, or John Shy - best represents the American experience with war? While reading Kennedy's - and Shy's - essay discussions, it's necessary to put their writings in the context of time.

Kennedy penned his essay in , and Shy wrote his in But notwithstanding the tumultuous global changes since the s, the assigned essays are timeless in their intelligent analysis, very important in terms of their forthright accuracy of U. However, the essay by Kennedy, in this writer's opinion, best reflects the big picture view of America, its peoples,…… [Read More].

However, this change has been a progressive process and largely set on economic premises and cooperation between the Saudi state and western ones. Nonetheless, it represents an important example of progress in the Middle East. At the moment the opinions regarding the current situation in the Middle East are rather mixed. On the one hand, there are those who see the Iranian case as being eloquent for the despise and opposing attitude of the majority in the Middle East; on the other hand, there are those who take Saudi Arabia as reference point for the possible success of future strategies concerning the democratization process and the way in which a totally Muslim country can change and improve its standards.

From this point-of-view, the situation in Saudi Arabia, the progress it made in areas such as social activities, political participation, education, and other levels at which the population can express itself…… [Read More]. U S War in Iraq Ever.

The only reason for entering Iraq was the fact that there was a significant Al Qaeda base. The Iraqis themselves are the victims of their position amid the violence. In effect, they are paying for hostility and a war that is not theirs and that they have no involvement in.

Perpetuating a war like this in a country that is essentially innocent is a gross violation not only of human rights, but also of ethics in general. In conclusion, the worst part of the war in Iraq is probably its duration.

Despite increasing public calls for a stop to the lack of ethical footing surrounding the war in Iraq, the American presence in the country has been ongoing for more than a decade under the premise of maintaining order and security. However, since the start of the war, and even…… [Read More].

Iraq War President George W. However, the United States has never claimed financial gain. The real criticism of this war is the rush to get there. The United States planned to solve the Iraqi war with force of arms even while the U.

As we all know now, they were never found, and that was the strongest and most primary reason for the war. Hidden Agendas and abylonian Intrigue. Iraq and…… [Read More]. War on Terror View Full Essay. The Global War on Terrorism: Interview by Geov Parrish. Soviet Economic Motives and the Subversion of Afghanistan. World Affairs, 3 , The Unintended Consequences of Afghanistan. World Policy Journal, 11 1 , In the Columbia Encyclopedia 6th ed. Aid, Peace and Justice in Afghanistan. The Future of the Mujahideen: International Peacekeeping, 14 1 , World Policy Journal, 3 25 , Reassessing Soviet Motives for Invading Afghanistan: Due to the negative aspects of the war on terror -- the pre-mature declaration of "mission accomplished," the abuses at Abu Gharib, the questionable legality of Guantanamo Bay, the warrantless wiretaps at home, and the difficulty in beating down the insurgencies in Iraq and Afghanistan -- by Bush's second term, the idea of the war on terror was losing some of its luster in the United States.

In the presidential election year of , the Democratic candidate Barack Obama refused to refer to the campaign against terrorists as the "war on terror" because the term had become so weighted down with negative connotations, and by not using it, he was signaling a change in approach.

Once elected, Obama referred to the ongoing struggle as the "Overseas Contingency Operation. Meyer argues that the idea of a war on terror was not inevitable, and an alternative response could have been fashioned around so-called "soft power" measures. These could have included "expanded funding for language instruction and comparative religion in American schools, improved training for first responders in medical emergencies, and an overhaul of the health care system to provide rapid responses to crises.

Also, unlike past American wars against distinct groups or nations, the war on terror relies on people agreeing on what defines terror itself. As the old saying goes, one man's terrorist in another man's freedom fighter, and this gray area can make building domestic and international support somewhat challenging. Under the current administration, the rhetoric of the war on terror has been shelved in favor of a more multi-lateral approach abroad and a focus on civil liberties at home.

However, many of the military tactics, such as the surge in Afghanistan, remain the same. Still, it seems helpful to have moved past the excesses of the early stages of the war on terror.

Present and the Re-Creation. Democratic Oversight of Intelligence Services. Understanding the War on Terror. Works Cited Butler, Smedley. War is a Racket. The war on terrorism is not just taking place in America, it is happening around the world. A good example is the terror ring in Germany that was broken up and uncovered enough materials to bomb and kill thousands of people. The war on terror does not have boundaries, because terrorists can be anywhere, and can target many different types of locations and people.

This means we have to support our allies as well as our own internal war on terrorism, and supporting our allies helps keep us safer, as well. Terrorists can be anywhere, and people understand that now. The war on terrorism does not promote hysteria or paranoia, it attacks terror in a logical way, and makes the people feel safer as a result. I think it is vital that we remain vigilant about the threat of terrorism, and do not become complacent or distanced from it.

We have to remain on guard at all times, and the war on terror helps people remember that we still have enemies, and we have to be vigilant about protecting ourselves from them. The war on terror is conducted so that we do not become complacent, but we also do not become paranoid about every person or activity. People need to remain calm and yet concerned, and I think the war on terror has helped promote those feelings, and that is another reason it is totally justified.

In conclusion, the war on terrorism has made things very different in this country, and we may never feel as safe as we did on September 10, However, the war on terror is justified because it has prevented more attacks, it saves lives, and it ensures our safety and well-being as much as it possibly can. The war on terrorism is justified, and it should, and will, continue in this country and around the world. Bibliography Associated Press Staff Arab League Chief Warns U.

Retrieved September 1, at http: Arab League Turns on Itself. Asia Times Online Ltd. Remarks on the Situation in the Middle East. Compilation of Presidential Documents. Works Cited Cutler, L. Enemy Combatants and Guantanamo: Persuasion in Civil Rights Advocacy: Lessons Learned in Representing Guantanamo Detainees. Michigan State Law Review, 4 , Works Cited Ackerman, Spencer. Additionally there is no research base to this article, as it is mostly opinion based, with no intention of researching a hypothesis, but rather stating one for the utilization of other researchers and experts to begin from.

The work does focus a great deal of direct attention on one single aspect of terrorism as the only global threat, from this standpoint it the work could be considered macroanalytic. The results of this work, again ar limited as it is largely an opinion work that stresses logical findings of one expert on the subject. The summation of the article, can again be demonstrative of the major point of the work, demonstrating through a logical flow that the source of the problem of Islamic extremism can only be dealt with at that source, and only after the region acknowledges such a threat as both internal and global, and stops associating all ills, on an ideological and political level with the interventions both current and historical of the West.

Works Cited Herman, Susan. Patriot Act and the U. In Partnership with CNN. The Washington Post Company, 12 Oct. International Terrorism and Security Research. Your October 16, Memo Re: Global War on Terrorism. Foreign Policy and the Center for American Progress. On the Internet at http: American foreign policy and global governance, in A. War in Afghanistan View Full Essay. Works Cited Associated Press. Retrieved November, , from http: This is an article that brought to light the ongoing violence in Afghanistan, in specifics the proverbial suicide bomber situation, where an radical Islamic terrorist is willing to blow himself up in order to kill others.

In this case the people killed with fellow Muslims -- worse yet, he killed people exiting a mosque following their worship services -- but clearly the message to the world was this: Baktash, Hashmat, and Magnier, Mark. Suicide bombing in Kabul kills as many as 13 Americans. Koran, Kalashnikov, and laptop: Only Three Choices for Afghan Endgame: Compromise, Conflict, or Collapse: Counting down to The Economic Costs of the Iraq War: Iraq War Scenarios, Global Insight.

Works Cited Chipman, Don. Rutgers University Press, Genealogies of the Afghan Jihad. University of California Press, The Soviet Withdrawal from Afghanistan: Terror Memo View Full Essay. Mother Jones, Oct Eric Holder, Obama's Albatross. Washington Post, 10 Oct Viewed 2 April Terror and War View Full Essay. Understanding the war on terror 3rd ed. Oxford University Press, A Pluralitic Perspective New York: War in Vietnam View Full Essay.

Counter-insurgency lessons from Vietnam. As Hanson points out, the jihadists do not need fighter jets, a navy fleet or even tanks to win their war against the west Hoover Institution, Hanson, online. Their tools are terrorism, and this, too, seems to be one of the aspects of the present and future nature of warfare that people choose not to acknowledge.

The goals of terrorism are no to destroy buildings, although the destruction of buildings as occurred on September 11, , does indeed further their work; it is rather to cause a disruption of the economy, to create political division, world discord, to instill a prevailing atmosphere of fear and panic, and to bring down the society that is the target of the terrorist acts.

In this regard, as we examine where America is today, and where the rest of the world is as economies are collapsing around us, it might be fair to say that the jihadists are winning their war of terrorism. Who would have believed, as Hanson so succinctly argues, that a world amidst the technological progress where the world stands today could be brought to its knees by terrorists who have effectively enslaved the freedoms that it has taken America and its post World War II allies hundreds of years to achieve?

Today, cartoon satire depicting Islamic extremists can be banned - instituting the Islamic fundamentalist goal to ban ideas and images; the words "war on terror" have been ostensibly set aside because they have become too psychologically burdensome to the public - instituting the Islamic fundamentalist goal to ban words from the language; and other examples of giving into the weight of terrorism as cited by Hanson Hanson, online.

Echoing Galbraith, the question must be asked, "Is this victory? Found online at http: Works Cited Charon, Mona. February 18 - March 3, Works Cited Lewis, Bernard. The Crisis of Islam: Holy War and Unholy Terror. The Modern Library, Works Cited Joseph, Paul. Are Americans becoming More Peaceful? A Power Governments Cannot Suppress. The Journal Newcastle, England.

March 17, , p. Red Badge of Courage. Big Two Hearted River. The Things They Carried. In this regard, public diplomacy can help to create a "level playing field" so that U. Numerous tactical options flow from this strategy. And regarding the millions of poor and struggling Muslims, the goal of U. A wide range of policy instruments are available to achieve this goal, complemented by public diplomacy that underscores America's concern and commitment on a personal level.

The story does not end there, however. The key ingredient missing from most analyses of the "why do they hate us? On rare occasions -- Algeria in the s, for example -- this battle has devolved into a shooting war. More commonly, it is a battle of ideas over how to organize societies. The fact that this battle rages in most countries without too many bombs going off or too many dead bodies piling up neither renders it any less momentous nor makes the imperative of victory any less urgent.

The United States has a vital stake in the outcome of this battle, both for the sake of Muslims themselves and for the security of Americans and U. Without reservation or apology, America's strategy should be to help non- and anti-Islamist Muslims beat back the Islamist challenge. This strategy must be pursued even if many of these putative Muslim allies express bitter dislike for certain aspects of U.

In the post-September 11 era, public diplomacy should be focused on fighting the battle of ideas in Muslim societies. This is a battle that can be won, though it will take more time, money, commitment, and ingenuity than the U. This set of essays discusses the many problems plaguing public diplomacy in the post-September 11 era and proposes how the United States should pursue what many regard as a mission impossible.

Collectively, the essays span the three years since September Four of them were written expressly for this collection, while the balance appeared previously in various publications and are reprinted here as originally published. The War on Terror is a preventive defensive strategy. The second is ostensibly preventive defense, the third may be interpreted to be so as may the fourth. The first and the fifth do not involve merely the use of force, and do not fall into the categories of defense, compellence, deterrence or swaggering.

It is plausible that the war is aggression mixed with defense, with the pretext of being entirely defensive. This would be supported by the observation that one and possibly another war has been initiated by the U. S without provocation, and statements have been made casually that show a willingness to disregard the sovereignty of other states, national integrity and human rights.

The war in Iraq is a case of failed deterrence, though the motives and outcomes in the situation are complex. American actions in the War on Terror are acting as demonstrations of power in some respects, as well as weakening in others loss of soldiers, vehicles, fuel, money etc.

They might be instilling fear in some actors in the world, but are also arousing hatred and anger among others, many of whom are not easily intimidated. If you need a custom essay, research paper, thesis, dissertation, term paper on Politics, Economics, Management or other discipline — feel free to contact our professional custom writing service. Order a custom written paper of high quality Professional Writers only.

Free Quote or Order now.

About The Authors

Main Topics

Privacy Policy

- Narco-Terror: the United States, the Drug War, and the War on Terror Introduction The United States has had a long-standing policy of intervening in the affairs of other nations when the country has thought it within its best interests to do so.

Privacy FAQs

Sep 11,  · Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror POL April 15, Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror Civil liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror have been the forefront of Congress since with the terrorist attack against The United States.

About Our Ads

War on Terror Essay When analyzing the world's current situation concerning terrorism, it is difficult to say whether the global war on terrorism has been a successful one. Since the September 11, attack on the World Trade Centers in New York City, George Bush, former president of the United States, vowed to defeat terrorism. Terrorism is the unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives.3/5(5).

Cookie Info

The war on terror is creating great misfortune on the lives of its victims. Governments have pointed at the War on Terror as justification to take away the rights of privacy of average citizens. The Israeli attacks on Palestinians are a direct example of how the war on terror has led to genocide. The Cold War and the War on Terror Words | 4 Pages. seems that during the Cold War and the War on Terror, many of the feelings that citizens felt were the .