Skip Nav

Essay on the Death Penalty

Client testimonials

❶States in the United States that do not use the death penalty usually have lower murder rates than states that do Internet.

Death Penalty Persuasive Essay

Research a Broad Topic
The problem of flawed executions
Research Paper on Death Penalty

Get the reasons as to why some countries have banned capital punishment while others are still practicing it. This will comfortably help to support your ideas.

Some people support the death penalty, but again, they are willing for it to be outlawed. Find out why this is so. What are the financial costs of executing this type of penalty? In some countries, people that have been sentenced to the death penalty may take several years before it is executed. This person can appeal to test the validity of the sentence.

This can be expensive. To come up with a good research paper on the death penalty, firstly, choose an interesting topic. Secondly, ensure that the topic has a lot of background information to support your arguments. You can always refine your topic after reading and getting more opinions. Ensure that you use current information regarding your topic. Finally, evaluate whether what you have found answers to the questions you had developed.

Such a handy manual. I advise reading this article to everyone who wants to write about the issue of the death penalty. Thanks to the authors. Your academic papers written by experts. There are those that are pro-death penalty advocates. They believe that the death penalty serves as a deterrent. They believe others will see that the offender is getting executed for their heinous crime, and this will deter them from ever committing such an act.

They feel that not only is the person who is executed unable to commit another murder, but other potential killers may also be dissuaded from killing Silverman One scientist concluded that every additional execution prevents about seven or eight people from committing murder Bender It mainly deters rational calm everyday citizens. Not those who act on emotion or the heat of the moment. One could argue that there are far more rational civilized people in this country than there are emotionally disturbed people.

The death penalty works because it instills psychological resistance to the act of murder, not because it offers a rational argument against committing the act at the time that the decision to murder is made Bender So every day citizens have instilled into their heads that it is bad to murder someone. But murders still occur on occasions when people are in an irrational state of mind. Even though a person may be rational one day they could become irrational on another day.

The irrational people are mainly at the hands of alcohol and drugs, but there are occasions where unusual circumstances exist. For example, a husband catching his wife in the act of adultery could drive him mentally into a rage and into a very irrational state of mind, which could ultimately lead to murder.

But there are also those people who are just straight up mentally disturbed that kill for no reason at all. But for the most part most Americans are rational people who are able to properly control themselves, because of proper patience and problem solving learned through schooling. Most Americans have goals to look forward to in life also. So the death penalty is a deterrent for the most part of society. Therefore the greater the punishment, the fewer people will behave in the irrational state of mind, because of the fact that the vast majority of Americans are most of the time drug free.

So the punishment of death deters their rational minds from the act of committing murder, because I would like to believe most Americans are rational, free thinking people.

Another reason pro-death penalty advocates give for their belief is that it serves as retribution, or an eye for an eye. These are the two main types of retribution: An eye for an eye relies on what people deserve for their crime, which determines what kind of punishment they will receive Nathanson Or in other words we should treat people the way they have treated others.

If someone murders someone, then they should be murdered. This type of punishment would not have any prejudice, because they would receive whatever they dished out. It tells us that the punishment is to be identical to the crime Nathanson People could say in the same circumstances a white man would only get ten years. But using an eye for an eye, both men would be raped in return. Nobody can really prove that any of these views are right or wrong.

In my opinion, God should have the final say on life. So who knows what to do? As a society we should determine the fate we have dealt ourselves. It is true that the varieties of ways in which men have put one another to death is horrific Isenberg It is society that should determine if we as a society want to be murderers.

These offenders, murderers, and killers are a mirror image of our own reflection in society. The largest percentage of readers are between the ages of 35 and 44, and the majority of readers have either a college degree or a graduate degree. This essay argues for a question of value. The death penalty is an issue that has the United States quite divided.

While there are many supporters of it, there is also a large amount of opposition. Currently, there are thirty-three states in which the death penalty is legal and seventeen states that have abolished it Death Penalty Information Center. I believe the death penalty should be legal throughout the nation. There are many reasons as to why I believe the death penalty should be legalized in all states, including deterrence, retribution, and morality; and because opposing arguments do not hold up, I will refute the ideas that the death penalty is unconstitutional, irrevocable mistakes are made, and that there is a disproportionality of race and income level.

The use of capital punishment greatly deters citizens from committing crimes such as murder. Ernest van den Haag, a professor at Fordham University, wrote about the issue of deterrence:. They fear most death deliberately inflicted by law and scheduled by the courts…. Hence, the threat of the death penalty may deter some murderers who otherwise might not have been deterred.

And surely the death penalty is the only penalty that could deter prisoners already serving a life sentence and tempted to kill a guard, or offenders about to be arrested and facing a life sentence. This was due to other possible murderers being deterred from committing murder after realizing thatother criminals are executed for their crimes.

Capital punishment also acts as a deterrent for recidivism the rate at which previously convicted criminals return to committing crimes after being released ; if the criminal is executed he has no opportunity to commit crimes again.

Some may argue that there is not enough concrete evidence to use deterrence as an argument for the death penalty. The reason some evidence may be inconclusive is that the death penalty often takes a while to be carried out; some prisoners sit on death row for years before being executed. This can influence the effectiveness of deterrence because punishments that are carried out swiftly are better examples to others.

Although the death penalty is already effective at deterring possible criminals, it would be even more effective if the legal process were carried out more quickly instead of having inmates on death row for years. The death penalty also carries out retribution justly. When someone commits a crime it disturbs the order of society; these crimes take away lives, peace, and liberties from society. Giving the death penalty as a punishment simply restores order to society and adequately punishes the criminal for his wrongdoing.

Retribution also serves justice for murder victims and their families. This lack of malice is proven in the simple definition of retribution: The death penalty puts the scales of justice back in balance after they were unfairly tipped towards the criminal. The morality of the death penalty has been hotly debated for many years.

Those opposed to the death penalty say that it is immoral for the government to take the life of a citizen under any circumstance.

It is immoral to not properly punish a person who has committed such a horrendous crime. The criminal is also executed humanely; in no way is he subjected to torture or any form of cruelty.

All states that use the death penalty use lethal injection; the days of subjecting a prisoner to hanging or the electric chair are long gone in the US. Inmates are first given a large dose of an anesthetic so they do not feel any pain Bosner ; this proves that the process is made as humane as possible so the inmates do not physically suffer. Although the issue of morality is very personal for many people, it is important to see the facts and realize that capital punishment does take morality into account and therefore is carried out in the best way possible.

The eighth amendment to the United States Constitution prevents cruel and unusual punishment. Many opponents of capital punishment say that execution is cruel and unusual punishment and therefore violates the Constitution.

As was stated earlier, the recipient of the death penalty is treated humanely and is not tortured in any way, shape, or form. After the anesthetic is administered the person feels no pain; the only part of the process that could be considered painful is when the IV is inserted, but that is done in hospitals on a daily basis and no one is calling it unconstitutional.

The Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld the death penalty as constitutional in cases they have presided over. In the case of Furman v. The Supreme Court has not found capital punishment to be unconstitutional, and therefore this argument for abolition is invalid. Another argument put forth by death penalty abolitionists is the possibility of executing an innocent person. Many people that argue this overestimate how often this happens, it is an extremely rare occurrence and has not happened since the death penalty was reintroduced in Mistakes will be made in any system which relies upon human testimony for proof.

We should be vigilant to uncover and avoid such mistakes.

Helping students improve writing skills since 2000!

Main Topics

Privacy Policy

Free Death Penalty papers, essays, and research papers.

Privacy FAQs

This assignment instructed students to write a persuasive essay which argues for a specific viewpoint or a specific action to be taken on a societal issue. I argued for a specific stance to be taken on the issue of the death penalty. The audience for this essay is the opinion section of the.

About Our Ads

English Task –Argumentative Essay The Death Penalty The argument of whether the death penalty is effective is an age-old and contentious issue. This is a very long document. Please allow the page to load completely. DEATH PENALTY AND SENTENCING INFORMATION In the United States 10/1/

Cookie Info

Get your research paper on the death penalty right. Tips and tricks on how to approach the paper or have it written in the right way within a short time. There are vast differences in the way people view the death penalty. Some oppose it and some agree with it. There have been many studies trying to prove or.