And in some districts, the severity of the punishment even depends on the nationality of the defendant. Some scientists have tried to find biological reasons for the tendency of Afro-Americans to break the law by attacking white people and robbing them violently. This idea proved to be the absolute nonsense due to the fact that there is no ethnic group that is more likely to commit crime than others. Everything depends on the social status, cultural development, the level and accessibility of education, the level of poverty, unemployment rate and the overall welfare of the place of residence.
To prove this, I would like to cite an example from the book written by Bohannan: Maybe now there is no harsh discrimination against this ethnic group, but they are still ethnic minorities without a lot of rights. Because of the prejudice and fear that they will steal something or kill somebody in the burst of anger, the employees are afraid of hiring them, thus leaving them without any source of income.
In order to feed the children, they are forced to sell marijuana, attack white people who walk in their districts and take their wallets, jewelry, and cell phones away. Accessed on 17 Jan at http: African Homicide and Suicide. Rely on professional writers with your college paper and take a load off your mind. Since the attainment of independence, the country has made tremendous advancements in all aspects extending from politics, economy, education, science, agriculture, technology and communication among other aspects.
These developments have not been achieved as a result of an individual rather it has taken the collective efforts of all Americans. In line with this, the issue of racial discrimination is more or less synonymous with the violation of fundamental human rights. Since the early days of slave trade, Americans have done a lot in order to eradicate all aspects of racial discrimination in the society. Consequently, it is more or less despicable to envisage a situation whereby racial profiling is accepted as a practice for law enforcement.
Prior to examining the various demerits of racial profiling, it is extremely important to evaluate its meaning. As briefly outlined in the introductory section, racial profiling refers to a situation whereby the race, ethnic background or nationality of an individual is used as a major factor of determining whether to subject him or her to law enforcement procedures.
On the other hand, the enactment of racial profiling seemingly exempts members of specific racial identities or ethnic backgrounds from random law enforcement procedures such as being stopped in traffic. The enactment or legislation of racial profiling within any given jurisdiction is associated with numerous implications most of which are undesirable within any given society.
To begin with, racial profiling has the potential to create sharp divisions in the society. This is due to the fact that individuals from certain ethnic backgrounds are considered more valuable as compared to others. For instance, people of Asian descent might feel less valuable as compared to their counterparts of non-Hispanic descent. Divisions within the society might also arise in terms of social standing; this is whereby the law is perceived as a tool for protecting the affluent or well-off people while discriminating against low or middle income earners.
Apart from creation of ethnic divisions within the society, another outstanding implication of the enactment of racial profiling as a law enforcement practice is that it results in the violation of fundamental human rights. If the provisions on human rights as enshrined in the Constitution of the United States of America are to be enhanced, elements such as racial profiling should not be legalized under any given circumstances. Another important implication of racial profiling is that it might easily result into rebellion within the society; this is whereby minority groups perpetrate violence in retaliation of being discriminated against.
Such attributes are extremely deleterious as far as societal values and co-existence are concerned. The Arizona SB Senate-Bill refers to a legislation that was passed by the Arizona State Senate and signed into law by the state governor in the year Widely considered as the sternest anti-illegal immigration legislation in the United States of America , this law is aimed at bringing about a sense of zero tolerance towards illegal immigration into Arizona.
One of the stipulations enshrined in the Arizona SB provides that it all aliens must always be in possession of registration documents failure to which they are liable for arrest. This law has come under extensive scrutiny while also generating unprecedented controversy since it is widely considered as a direct legalization of racial profiling in the State of Arizona. Racial profiling works in different ways depending on the specific historical or cultural context in question within a given society.
For example, during World War II , people of Japanese and German origins were targeted by racial profiling, due to the fact that the United States was at war with the nations of Japan and Germany. Japanese-Americans were rounded up and placed in internment camps after the bombing of Pearl Harbor. Today, people of Japanese origins are generally viewed as a relatively harmless security threat by law enforcement. People of German origins have more or less been simply assimilated to the overarching racial category of Caucasian , along with the Irish who were largely discriminated against in the infancy of the U.
Other forms of racial profiling, however, have emerged over time; and some forms have proven to have disconcerting staying power over the course of American history as a whole. What is clear, however, is that racial profiling—that is, directing selective law enforcement attention to certain demographic groups of people—has also been a significant practice within the context of law enforcement within most societies across time and place.
It will now be worth turning attention to some of the more important forms of racial profiling within the United States today.
One of the most prominent and ongoing examples of racial profiling within the contemporary United States surely consists of the profiling of African Americans—and more specifically, of young black men. This kind of racial profiling has been responsible, in a virtually singlehanded way, for the emergence of the Black Lives Matter movement.
As the movement itself has written: Rooted in the experience of African-Americans in this country who actively resist our de-humanization in this country, BlackLivesMatter is a call to action paragraph 1.
Essentially, police officers have recently directed lethal force against young black men in a way that they probably would not against civilians of other racial groups. First with Al-Qadea , then the rise of ISIS , and more general threats to national security emerging from nations in the Middle East, tensions are high. If he had been speaking any other language, he likely would not have been removed from the flight.
The fact he was Muslim and a speaker of Arabic, the fellow passenger immediately made a mental connection regarding terrorism.
Such examples, some extremely serious could be multiplied endlessly, and together could constitute a broad picture of the racial profiling of Muslims not only by law enforcement but every-day non-Muslim civilians.
Some stakeholders have suggested that racial profiling is in fact a valid law enforcement practice that should be permitted to continue within the United States. This argument has always been a pragmatic one in nature. Advocates of racial profiling contend that it's a necessary tool during an investigation. Law enforcement officers rely on their training and experience when developing a case and if their expertise leads them to believe that a subject is involved in.
For example, it is an undisputed fact that most terrorist threats targeting the United States today originate from Muslim countries ; therefore, if law enforcement observes numerous Muslims about committing this sort of crime, then it would perhaps be appropriate for him to in the future pay more attention to young Muslim men than say, elderly White women when attempting to prevent such crime from happening in the future. This argument is based on the fundamental insight that at a statistical level, people from certain demographics often are more likely to commit certain crimes associated with that background than those from an unrelated background.
From a law enforcement perspective, it would make no sense whatsoever to disregard this insight simply because it may strike some as politically insensitive.
Rather, law enforcement officials must use all the information at their disposal to detect crimes in the present and deter future crimes.
If some level of racial profiling were to provide crucial intelligence that did indeed deter crime, the conclusion is perhaps that racial profiling should in fact remain a part of law enforcement's more general professional arsenal. Racial profiling would thus constitute a direct violation of civil rights. It would deny the right of every American to be legally treated first and foremost as an American and not primarily as a member of any one demographic category.
There is also the obvious point that even the potential benefits of racial profiling may not always cover the costs. The fact that most terrorists today happen to be Muslim does not conversely imply that most Muslims are actually terrorists.
upload your essay. browse editors. argumentative. compare and contrast. log in × scroll to top. Racial Profiling Essay Examples. 65 total results. An Analysis of the Topic of Racial Profiling Amongst Minority Individuals in the States of New Jersey. words. 2 pages. Racial Discrimination Against People of Color by the American Police.
The introduction should contain your main statement. A pretty wrong thing about racial profiling thing, talking about worldwide level, is telling political authorities that it is not only a “politically incorrect” thing, but instead a destructive law enforcement method. Racial profiling should be specifically explained.
- Brent Staples’ essay, “When the Paranoids Turn Out to be Right,” acknowledges the issues of racism and racial profiling committed by police. In “Fist, Stick, Knife, Gun,” Geoffrey Canada also expresses views on this issue when he asserts that police fail to protect . Racial profiling has been a part of the criminal justice system for a long time now, and is nothing new. The only reason why you hear a lot more about this topic is because the use of media has brought this very controversial topic to the public's attention a lot more than in the past.
While racial profiling is most commonly committed against ethnic minorities, many instances of racial profiling occur in reaction to specific crimes, making any racial or cultural group subject to more intensive scrutiny by the authorities. Racial Profiling. The term “racial profiling” was firstly used by the American mass media approximately in But the roots of this problem started to appear much earlier. The first, who complained about being discriminated were Afro-Americans and Hispanics.